W.L.E., LLC v. Missouri Department of Health & Senior Services

271 S.W.3d 637, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1699
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 16, 2008·No. ED 91422·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals from the decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission dismissing his Petition for Review as untimely. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W.L.E., LLC v. Missouri Department of Health & Senior Services, 271 S.W.3d 637, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1699 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

271 S.W.3d 637 (W.L.E., LLC v. Missouri Department of Health & Senior Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. City of St. Louis
271 S.W.3d 637 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)