W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.
This text of W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. (W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC USA, INC., AND MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ______________________
2012-1538 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 10-CV-0441, Judge Mark S. Davis. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
AHMED J. DAVIS, Fish & Richardson, P.C., of Washing- ton, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were JUANITA R. BROOKS, of San Diego, California, and SUSAN M. COLETTI, of Wilmington, Delaware.
JAMES J. ELACQUA, Skadden Arps, of Palo Alto, Cali- fornia, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were KAREN D. MCDANIEL and RACHEL C. HUGHEY, Merchant & Gould P.C., of Minneapolis, Minnesota; and RYAN J. FLETCHER of Denver, Colorado. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, and DYK, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
September 12, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wl-gore-associates-inc-v-medtronic-inc-cafc-2013.