Wixon v. Marcus
This text of 54 N.E. 357 (Wixon v. Marcus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by the defendants from a taxation of costs in the Superior Court. The only item in dispute is that of travel for two terms or sittings. The question seems to us to be settled by Bliss v. Tripp, 16 Gray, 287, and White v. Judd, 1 Met. 293.
The plaintiff says in his brief that he has given bond and taken out execution under Pub. Sts. c. 198, § 26, and asks for [68]*68costs of this appeal and a separate execution therefor pursuant to § 27 of the same chapter. We see no reason why he should not have them.
Judgment affirmed with costs of this appeal and execution to issue therefor.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 N.E. 357, 174 Mass. 67, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wixon-v-marcus-mass-1899.