Witzke v. Attorney Grievance Commission
743 N.W.2d 36, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 103, 2008 WL 82755
This text of 743 N.W.2d 36 (Witzke v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Witzke v. Attorney Grievance Commission, 743 N.W.2d 36, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 103, 2008 WL 82755 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
Scott Andrew WITZKE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
743 N.W.2d 36, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 103, 2008 WL 82755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witzke-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2008.