Witwer v. Henningson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Witwer v. Henningson

215 A.D. 844

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 215 A.D. 844 (Witwer v. Henningson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Witwer v. Henningson, 215 A.D. 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion to change place of trial reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. (See Woodland Lumber, etc., Co. v. Barnett, 185 App. Div. 572, and Pulaski v. Tryon, 214 id. 822.) Rich, Jaycox and Kapper, JJ., concur; Kelly, P. J., and Lazansky, J., dissent upon the ground that neither the convenience of witnesses nor the interests of justice would be served by a change of venue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to change place of trial reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. (See Woodland Lumber, etc., Co. v. Barnett, 185 App. Div. 572, and Pulaski v. Tryon, 214 id. 822.) Rich, Jaycox and Kapper, JJ., concur; Kelly, P. J., and Lazansky, J., dissent upon the ground that neither the convenience of witnesses nor the interests of justice would be served by a change of venue.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D. 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witwer-v-henningson-nyappdiv-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack