Wittmer v. Greenhalgh
This text of 256 A.D. 839 (Wittmer v. Greenhalgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for an injunction brought by a taxpayer in the village of Quogue, it appears that one of two bridges in the village was destroyed and the other seriously damaged by the hurricane of September 21, 1938. It is sought to restrain certain officials of the county of Suffolk from proceeding with the construction of a new bridge and to restrain certain officials of the village of Quogue from applying village funds toward a part of the cost of approaches to the proposed bridge. Appeal is from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 A.D. 839, 9 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wittmer-v-greenhalgh-nyappdiv-1939.