Wittman v. Personhuballah
136 S. Ct. 499, 193 L. Ed. 2d 364, 84 U.S.L.W. 3274, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 7167
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 13, 2015·No. No. 14–1504.·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits. In addition to the questions presented by the jurisdictional statement, parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: Whether appellants lack standing because none reside in or represent the only congressional district whose constitutionality is at issue in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wittman v. Personhuballah, 136 S. Ct. 499, 193 L. Ed. 2d 364, 84 U.S.L.W. 3274, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 7167 (U.S. 2015).
136 S. Ct. 499 (Wittman v. Personhuballah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Personhuballah v. Alcorn
155 F. Supp. 3d 552 (E.D. Virginia, 2016)