Wittman v. City of Billings

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wittman v. City of Billings. Read the opinion of the Court — 2022 MT 129
Montana Supreme Court·Decided May 28, 2021·No. DA 20-0609·Unpublished

Opinion

05/28/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0609

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 20-0609

ARIANE WITTMAN and JEREMY TAYLEN,

Plaintiffs/Appellants, GRANT OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEE’S -vs- ANSWER BRIEF BY JUNE 16, 2021 CITY OF BILLINGS,

Defendant/Appellee.

Appellee has filed an Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to and

including June 16, 2021, within which to file Appellee’s Answer Brief. Based upon

the Affidavit of Appellee’s counsel as to the necessity of the extension, for good

cause appearing and noting Appellants do not object to this Motion, the Court hereby

GRANTS the Motion. Appellee shall have up to June 16, 2021, within which to file

the Appellee’s Answer Brief. No further extensions shall be granted unless

extraordinary circumstances are present.

DATED this ____ day of May, 2021.

_____________________________

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court May 28 2021

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wittman v. City of Billings, (Mo. 2021).

Wittman v. City of Billings (Wittman v. City of Billings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.