Wittenberg Distributors, Inc. v. Kuhns Brothers & Laidlaw, Inc.

151 A.D.2d 978, 542 N.Y.S.2d 67, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8290

This text of 151 A.D.2d 978 (Wittenberg Distributors, Inc. v. Kuhns Brothers & Laidlaw, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wittenberg Distributors, Inc. v. Kuhns Brothers & Laidlaw, Inc., 151 A.D.2d 978, 542 N.Y.S.2d 67, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8290 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: A retainer fee will not be deemed nonrefundable unless the language of an agreement to that effect is clear and it is established that the party obligated to pay the retainer understood that to be the nature of the agreement (see, Jacobson v Sassower, 66 NY2d 991, 993, affg 107 AD2d 603). In this case, the agreement omitted any reference to whether the retainer was refundable, and Supreme Court correctly determined that plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment for the amount of the retainer fee it paid. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Lowery, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jacobson v. Sassower
489 N.E.2d 1283 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Jacobson v. Sassower
107 A.D.2d 603 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 A.D.2d 978, 542 N.Y.S.2d 67, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wittenberg-distributors-inc-v-kuhns-brothers-laidlaw-inc-nyappdiv-1989.