Witten v. Richmond Hts.

Ohio Supreme Court

Witten v. Richmond Hts.

2001 Ohio 280, 91 Ohio St. 3d 204

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 27, 2001

Docket2000-0917

StatusPublished

This text of 2001 Ohio 280 (Witten v. Richmond Hts.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Witten v. Richmond Hts., 2001 Ohio 280, 91 Ohio St. 3d 204 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 204.]

WITTEN, APPELLEE, v. CITY OF RICHMOND HEIGHTS ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Witten v. Richmond Hts., 2001-Ohio-280.] Appellate procedure—Final order—Political subdivision tort liability—R.C. 2744.02(C)—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Stevens v. Ackman. (No. 00-917—Submitted February 28, 2001—Decided March 28, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 77728. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Stevens v. Ackman (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 182, ___ N.E.2d ___. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Lester S. Potash, for appellee. R. Todd Hunt, Director of Law; Walter & Haverfield, P.L.L., Jonathan D. Greenberg and Barbara R. Marburger, for appellants. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 204.]

WITTEN, APPELLEE, v. CITY OF RICHMOND HEIGHTS ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Witten v. Richmond Hts., 2001-Ohio-280.] Appellate procedure—Final order—Political subdivision tort liability—R.C. 2744.02(C)—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Stevens v. Ackman. (No. 00-917—Submitted February 28, 2001—Decided March 28, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 77728. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Stevens v. Ackman (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 182, ___ N.E.2d ___. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Lester S. Potash, for appellee. R. Todd Hunt, Director of Law; Walter & Haverfield, P.L.L., Jonathan D. Greenberg and Barbara R. Marburger, for appellants. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 280, 91 Ohio St. 3d 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witten-v-richmond-hts-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack