Witten v. Poindexter

Texas Supreme Court

Witten v. Poindexter

25 Tex. 378

DecidedOctober 15, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 25 Tex. 378 (Witten v. Poindexter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Witten v. Poindexter, 25 Tex. 378 (Tex. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Roberts, J.

—The defect in the cause of action, as stated in the petition, is, that no particular land was identified, for which a judgment could have been rendered for plaintiff below, upon a recovery by him. The statement of facts appearing in the transcript has no approval by the district judge who tried the cause. There is', therefore, no ground of reversal presented in the record of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts, J.

—The defect in the cause of action, as stated in the petition, is, that no particular land was identified, for which a judgment could have been rendered for plaintiff below, upon a recovery by him. The statement of facts appearing in the transcript has no approval by the district judge who tried the cause. There is', therefore, no ground of reversal presented in the record of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Tex. 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witten-v-poindexter-tex-1860.