Wittek v. Cirigliano

177 A.D.2d 610, 576 N.Y.S.2d 527, 19 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1607, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14436

This text of 177 A.D.2d 610 (Wittek v. Cirigliano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wittek v. Cirigliano, 177 A.D.2d 610, 576 N.Y.S.2d 527, 19 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1607, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the respondent, a Justice of the Supreme Court, from enforcing rulings made on November 4 and 6, 1991, barring the petitioner from revealing the substance of a pretrial proceeding held in the Supreme Court, Richmond County, on November 4, 1991, in a pending criminal action entitled People v Pappalardo, under Richmond County Indictment Number 212/89, and to prohibit enforcement of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated November 7, 1991, which directed the petitioner, among others, not to "publish any material discussed during the * * * hearing”.

Adjudged that the petition is granted, without costs or disbursements, the respondent is prohibited from enforcing his rulings made on November 4 and 6, 1991, and his order dated November 7, 1991, and it is further,

Ordered that the transcripts of the stenographic minutes of the proceedings held before the respondent in the Supreme Court, Richmond County, on November 4, 1991, and November 12, 1991, respectively, in the pending criminal action entitled People v Pappalardo under Richmond County Indictment Number 212/89, are unsealed.

The respondent’s rulings and order restraining the media from reporting with respect to the proceedings which occurred in open court violate the prohibition against prior restraints embodied in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (see, Nebraska Press Assn. v Stuart, 427 US 539; Matter of Hays v Marano, 114 AD2d 387). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart
427 U.S. 539 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Hays v. Marano
114 A.D.2d 387 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 A.D.2d 610, 576 N.Y.S.2d 527, 19 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1607, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wittek-v-cirigliano-nyappdiv-1991.