Witte v. Derby Fishing Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Witte v. Derby Fishing Co.

2 Conn. 260

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedNovember 15, 1817

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Conn. 260 (Witte v. Derby Fishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Witte v. Derby Fishing Co., 2 Conn. 260 (Colo. 1817).

Pincite

Opinion

Swift, Ch. J.

The question submitted to ns in this case, depends upon the same principle, as the preceding case of Bulkley and others against these defendants ; and I should advise, that the testimony offered, is admissible.

In this opinion, the other Judges severally concurred, except Baldwin, J. who gave no opinion, being a stockholder in the company. The Judges who dissented from the opinion of the majority in the last case, after that case was decided, considered this as governed by it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swift, Ch. J.

The question submitted to ns in this case, depends upon the same principle, as the preceding case of Bulkley and others against these defendants ; and I should advise, that the testimony offered, is admissible.

In this opinion, the other Judges severally concurred, except Baldwin, J. who gave no opinion, being a stockholder in the company. The Judges who dissented from the opinion of the majority in the last case, after that case was decided, considered this as governed by it.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Conn. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witte-v-derby-fishing-co-conn-1817.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack