Witte v. Derby Fishing Co.

2 Conn. 260
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 15, 1817·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Swift, Ch. J.

The question submitted to ns in this case, depends upon the same principle, as the preceding case of Bulkley and others against these defendants ; and I should advise, that the testimony offered, is admissible.

In this opinion, the other Judges severally concurred, except Baldwin, J. who gave no opinion, being a stockholder in the company. The Judges who dissented from the opinion of the majority in the last case, after that case was decided, considered this as governed by it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Witte v. Derby Fishing Co., 2 Conn. 260 (Colo. 1817).

2 Conn. 260 (Witte v. Derby Fishing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hovey v. Magill
2 Conn. 680 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1818)