Witt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Witt v. State

46 S.W.2d 1009

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 24, 1932

DocketNo. 15114

StatusPublished

This text of 46 S.W.2d 1009 (Witt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Witt v. State, 46 S.W.2d 1009 (Tex. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, P. J.,

The offense is the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The indictment is regular and regularly presented. No departure from the proper procedure is disclosed by the record. In the absence of the evidence which was before the trial court, the complaints of the charge and the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction cannot be appraised by this court. Without a showing in the record to the contrary, this court is bound to presume that in entering the judgment the trial court acted within the law.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, P. J.,

The offense is the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The indictment is regular and regularly presented. No departure from the proper procedure is disclosed by the record. In the absence of the evidence which was before the trial court, the complaints of the charge and the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction cannot be appraised by this court. Without a showing in the record to the contrary, this court is bound to presume that in entering the judgment the trial court acted within the law.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 S.W.2d 1009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witt-v-state-texcrimapp-1932.