Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Witt v. State

Witt v. State

773 So. 2d 1200, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15935, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2777
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 6, 2000
DocketNo. 3D00-2368
StatusPublished

This text of 773 So. 2d 1200 (Witt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Witt v. State, 773 So. 2d 1200, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15935, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2777 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the state’s proper confession of error, we reverse the order denying defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. Defendant committed the offenses giving rise to the conviction within the appropriate window period for receiving relief under State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999). Salters v. State, 758 So.2d 667 (Fla.2000)(0ct. 1, 1995, through May 24, 1997, window for single-subject challenges). Hence, defendant is entitled to be resentenced in accordance with the valid laws in effect at the time defendant committed the offenses. Scruggs v. State, 761 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Order reversed; sentence vacated and remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Salters v. State
758 So. 2d 667 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
State v. Thompson
750 So. 2d 643 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Scruggs v. State
761 So. 2d 1265 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
773 So. 2d 1200, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15935, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witt-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.