Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical Center

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical Center

733 A.2d 228, 249 Conn. 910, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 215

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 2, 1999·No. SC 16115·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 699 (AC 17709), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant pathologist had no continuing duty to report his actual medical findings and diagnosis concerning the named plaintiffs suspected medical conditions?”

MCDONALD, J.,

did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Joel T. Faxon and Christopher D. Bernard, in support of the petition. R. J. Weber, in opposition. Decided June 2, 1999

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 699 (AC 17709), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant pathologist had no continuing duty to report his actual medical findings and diagnosis concerning the named plaintiffs suspected medical conditions?”

MCDONALD, J.,

did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Joel T. Faxon and Christopher D. Bernard, in support of the petition. R. J. Weber, in opposition. Decided June 2, 1999

Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical Center, 733 A.2d 228, 249 Conn. 910, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 215 (Colo. 1999).

Pincite

733 A.2d 228 (Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related