Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical Center

733 A.2d 228, 249 Conn. 910, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 215
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 2, 1999
DocketSC 16115
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 733 A.2d 228 (Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical Center, 733 A.2d 228, 249 Conn. 910, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 215 (Colo. 1999).

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 699 (AC 17709), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant pathologist had no continuing duty to report his actual medical findings and diagnosis concerning the named plaintiffs suspected medical conditions?”

MCDONALD, J.,

did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Joel T. Faxon and Christopher D. Bernard, in support of the petition. R. J. Weber, in opposition. Decided June 2, 1999

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical Center
746 A.2d 753 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
733 A.2d 228, 249 Conn. 910, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witt-v-st-vincents-medical-center-conn-1999.