Witt v. Kaufman & Kleaver

25 Tex. 384
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 25 Tex. 384 (Witt v. Kaufman & Kleaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Witt v. Kaufman & Kleaver, 25 Tex. 384 (Tex. 1860).

Opinion

Wheeler, 0. J.

—There was no legal service upon the defendant to appear and answer to the suit "before the justice. A citation, directed to an officer of Dallas county to execute,-was no authority to the sheriff of Parker county to execute the process. Service of the 'process by him was, in contemplation of law, no service. The court, therefore, had not jurisdiction of the person of the defendant, and the judgment was consequently void. The defendant, therefore, was entitled to have it so declared, and the proceedings under it enjoined. But the court having obtained cognizance of the case for one purpose, would retain it for • the further purpose of doing full and complete_ justice between the parties, and would give judgment for the plaintiff upon the cause of action on which the judgment of the justice was rendered, if, upon the merits, the .plaintiff was entitled to judgment. Such is the practice as settled by the decisions of this court. (Edrington v. Allsbrooks, 21 Tex., 186; Willis v. Gordon, 22 Tex., 241.)

We are of opinion that the court erred in dismissing the petition, for which the judgment must be

Reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hisler v. Channelview Bank
538 S.W.2d 200 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
State Ex Rel. Dishman v. Gary
359 S.W.2d 456 (Texas Supreme Court, 1962)
Turner v. Ephraim
28 S.W.2d 608 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Martin v. King
23 S.W.2d 747 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Zane-Cetti v. City of Fort Worth
21 S.W.2d 355 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Austin v. Conaway
283 S.W. 189 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Bath v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.
78 S.W. 993 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1904)
Wellington v. Beck
29 Colo. 73 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1901)
Taylor v. Goodrich
40 S.W. 515 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1897)
Byars v. Justin
2 Wilson 603 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1885)
Barnhart v. Clark
59 Tex. 552 (Texas Supreme Court, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Tex. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witt-v-kaufman-kleaver-tex-1860.