Witt v. Chaundry
This text of 470 F. App'x 138 (Witt v. Chaundry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charles W. Witt appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 [139]*139U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and granting summary judgment to Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Witt v. Chaundry, No. l:10-cv-01164-LOIDD, 2011 WL 6140959 (E.D.Va. Dec. 9, 2011). We deny Witt’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
470 F. App'x 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witt-v-chaundry-ca4-2012.