Witt v. Cable Ad Concepts, Inc.
This text of 440 F. App'x 186 (Witt v. Cable Ad Concepts, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Taylor Stone Witt appeals the district court’s order denying as untimely her motion to amend her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. As Witt filed her motion after the district court dismissed her complaint with prejudice, the motion was clearly untimely. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
440 F. App'x 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witt-v-cable-ad-concepts-inc-ca4-2011.