Witt v. Baker
This text of 84 S.E. 607 (Witt v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was no substantial error in any of the rulings upon the pleadings or as to the admissibility of the testimony. Under the ruling in Witt v. Baker, 13 Ga. App. 396 (79 S. E. 243), no issue was properly before the trial court other than the meaning of the phrase “services rendered previous to this date;” and since, according to the testimony, including that of the defendant himself, this language clearly referred to the services of the plaintiff in procuring the option which he transferred to the defendant, a finding in favor of the plaintiff was demanded, and the direction of the verdict was harmless.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 S.E. 607, 16 Ga. App. 146, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witt-v-baker-gactapp-1915.