Witschard v. A. Brody & Sons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Witschard v. A. Brody & Sons, Inc.

232 A.D. 768

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 232 A.D. 768 (Witschard v. A. Brody & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Witschard v. A. Brody & Sons, Inc., 232 A.D. 768 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents, being of opinion that the testimony shows that there was a guaranty by defendant A. Brody & Sons, Inc., of the account of Edwin S. Buckley; that such guaranty was within the Statute of Frauds,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents, being of opinion that the testimony shows that there was a guaranty by defendant A. Brody & Sons, Inc., of the account of Edwin S. Buckley; that such guaranty was within the Statute of Frauds,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D. 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witschard-v-a-brody-sons-inc-nyappdiv-1931.