Witmore v. Russel

3 Cai. Cas. 135, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 479
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1805
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Cai. Cas. 135 (Witmore v. Russel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Witmore v. Russel, 3 Cai. Cas. 135, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 479 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

Opinion

Per curiam.

You should have filed your stipulation, entered a rule nisi for judgment, served a certified copy of the rule, with a taxed bill of costs, and made a demand of pay[136]*136ment. You can take nothing by your motion unless you account for the not doing so.

N. B. This being done, the defendant obtained his costs* but the plaintiff had leave to stipulate again.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cai. Cas. 135, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witmore-v-russel-nysupct-1805.