Withrow v. Perron

Supreme Court of Florida

Withrow v. Perron

172 So. 2d 820, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3316

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 17, 1965

DocketNo. 33896

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 172 So. 2d 820 (Withrow v. Perron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Withrow v. Perron, 172 So. 2d 820, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3316 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 18, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI