Withrow v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Withrow v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.

982 A.2d 511, 603 Pa. 682

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 22, 2009

Docket122 WAL 2009, 123 WAL 2009, 124 WAL 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 982 A.2d 511 (Withrow v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Withrow v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp., 982 A.2d 511, 603 Pa. 682 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

JOSEPH M. WITHROW AND TAMMY J. WITHROW, HIS WIFE, Petitioners
v.
HOOSIER RACING TIRE CORP., MOTORDROME SPEEDWAY, INC., SMITHTON ENTERPRISES, INC., WHEEL SPECIALTIES, INC., CAROLE A. MILLER, D/B/A PRECISION CHASSIS & MACHINE, CARRY ALL PRODUCTS, INC., CARRY ALL PRODUCTS, CARRY ALL PRODUCTS, ETC., INC., SHAWN M. PHILLA, CAP RACING INC., CAP GLASS, INC., Respondents
PORT CITY RACING, INC., LANE AUTOMOTIVE, INC., A/K/A MOTOR STATE DISTRIBUTING, LEFTHANDER CHASSIS, INC., AND T. CLISE RACE CAR PARTS WAREHOUSE, Respondents

Nos. 122 WAL 2009, 123 WAL 2009, 124 WAL 2009

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.

October 22, 2009.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of October 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOSEPH M. WITHROW AND TAMMY J. WITHROW, HIS WIFE, Petitioners
v.
HOOSIER RACING TIRE CORP., MOTORDROME SPEEDWAY, INC., SMITHTON ENTERPRISES, INC., WHEEL SPECIALTIES, INC., CAROLE A. MILLER, D/B/A PRECISION CHASSIS & MACHINE, CARRY ALL PRODUCTS, INC., CARRY ALL PRODUCTS, CARRY ALL PRODUCTS, ETC., INC., SHAWN M. PHILLA, CAP RACING INC., CAP GLASS, INC., Respondents
PORT CITY RACING, INC., LANE AUTOMOTIVE, INC., A/K/A MOTOR STATE DISTRIBUTING, LEFTHANDER CHASSIS, INC., AND T. CLISE RACE CAR PARTS WAREHOUSE, Respondents