Withrow v. Fowler
30 F. Cas. 402, 7 Nat. Bank. Reg. 339, 6 Alb. Law J. 422, 1872 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15
Opinion
sustained the point and charged the jury as follows; “The jury are instructed that the plaintiff cannot recover in this action for any property or accounts transferred or assigned by the copartnership of Dunbar, Smith [403] & Co., to a creditor of said copartnership, by •way of preference or otherwise.”
The jury returned a verdict for defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Withrow v. Fowler, 30 F. Cas. 402, 7 Nat. Bank. Reg. 339, 6 Alb. Law J. 422, 1872 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15 (E.D. Mo. 1872).
30 F. Cas. 402 (Withrow v. Fowler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.