Withey v. Osceola Circuit Judge

108 Mich. 168
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 4, 1895·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This application is to have the circuit judge fix the amount and certify the same under Act. No. 96, Pub. Acts 1893. People v. Hanifan, 99 Mich. 516, is not controlling, as section 9047, 2 How. Stat., does not either fix the amount, limit the same, or determine who shall fix it. Act No. 96 limits the amount, and provides that the presiding judge shall fix the same. This is competent under People v. Macomb Co. Supervisors, 3 Mich. 475, and People v. Wayne Co. Auditors, 13 Mich. 233.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Withey v. Osceola Circuit Judge, 108 Mich. 168 (Mich. 1895).

108 Mich. 168 (Withey v. Osceola Circuit Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duncan v. State
774 N.W.2d 89 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2009)
Township of Cedar Creek v. Board of Supervisors
97 N.W. 409 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1903)