Witherwax v. Averill
6 Cow. 589
Opinion
The ground upon which we compel a defendant to elect between a plea of nul tiel record, and other pleas, is, that their mode of trial is different; one being by the record, the others by jury. No such consequence follows here from retaining both pleas. The existence of a justice’s judgment is not determinable at bar, by the record. It ranks as a specialty. (16 John. 233.) And the plea of nul tiel record, if it be good and capable of trial, in this case, must be tried by a jury.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Witherwax v. Averill, 6 Cow. 589 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).
6 Cow. 589 (Witherwax v. Averill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whitaker v. Bramson
29 F. Cas. 947 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1855)