Witherspoon v. Swift Bros.
37 S.E. 976, 112 Ga. 689, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 57
Opinion
1. It was too late,,after an attachment case had proceeded to final judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant therein, to file a claim in resistance to a levy entered upon the attachment and not designed to arrest the progress of the execution. ;•
2. Were it otherwise, there was in the present case no error in dismissing the alleged claim,, the same being evidenced only by a paper purporting to be an affidavit, which was not attested by any officer.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Witherspoon v. Swift Bros., 37 S.E. 976, 112 Ga. 689, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 57 (Ga. 1901).
37 S.E. 976 (Witherspoon v. Swift Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
School District of Ferndale v. Royal Oak Township School District No. 8
291 N.W. 199 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1940)