Witherspoon v. Swift Bros.

37 S.E. 976, 112 Ga. 689, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 57
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 28, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 37 S.E. 976 (Witherspoon v. Swift Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Witherspoon v. Swift Bros., 37 S.E. 976, 112 Ga. 689, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 57 (Ga. 1901).

Opinion

Lewis, J.

1. It was too late,,after an attachment case had proceeded to final judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant therein, to file a claim in resistance to a levy entered upon the attachment and not designed to arrest the progress of the execution. ;•

2. Were it otherwise, there was in the present case no error in dismissing the alleged claim,, the same being evidenced only by a paper purporting to be an affidavit, which was not attested by any officer.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 S.E. 976, 112 Ga. 689, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witherspoon-v-swift-bros-ga-1901.