Witherspoon v. Swift Bros.
This text of 37 S.E. 976 (Witherspoon v. Swift Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. It was too late,,after an attachment case had proceeded to final judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant therein, to file a claim in resistance to a levy entered upon the attachment and not designed to arrest the progress of the execution. ;•
2. Were it otherwise, there was in the present case no error in dismissing the alleged claim,, the same being evidenced only by a paper purporting to be an affidavit, which was not attested by any officer.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 S.E. 976, 112 Ga. 689, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witherspoon-v-swift-bros-ga-1901.