Witherspoon v. State
876 S.W.2d 759, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 596, 1994 WL 120140
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Witherspoon v. State, 876 S.W.2d 759, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 596, 1994 WL 120140 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
876 S.W.2d 759 (Witherspoon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.