Witherspoon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Witherspoon v. State

159 So. 3d 288, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2976, 2015 WL 895936

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 4, 2015

DocketNo. 2D14-832

StatusPublished

This text of 159 So. 3d 288 (Witherspoon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Witherspoon v. State, 159 So. 3d 288, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2976, 2015 WL 895936 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

KHOUZAM, Judge.

We affirm Cameron S. Witherspoon’s judgment and sentence in this Anders¹ appeal. But we remand for the trial court to correct two scrivener’s errors in the order revoking probation, which incorrectly indicates that Witherspoon admitted to the violation of probation and lists six violations of condition five even though the trial court found only one.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

ALTENBERND and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KHOUZAM, Judge.

We affirm Cameron S. Witherspoon’s judgment and sentence in this Anders¹ appeal. But we remand for the trial court to correct two scrivener’s errors in the order revoking probation, which incorrectly indicates that Witherspoon admitted to the violation of probation and lists six violations of condition five even though the trial court found only one.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

ALTENBERND and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 So. 3d 288, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2976, 2015 WL 895936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witherspoon-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack