Witherspoon v. State
159 So. 3d 288, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2976, 2015 WL 895936
Opinion
We affirm Cameron S. Witherspoon’s judgment and sentence in this Anders1 appeal. But we remand for the trial court to correct two scrivener’s errors in the order revoking probation, which incorrectly indicates that Witherspoon admitted to the violation of probation and lists six violations of condition five even though the trial court found only one.
Affirmed and remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Witherspoon v. State, 159 So. 3d 288, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2976, 2015 WL 895936 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
159 So. 3d 288 (Witherspoon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)