Witherspoon v. Stansberry

Fourth Circuit

Witherspoon v. Stansberry

464 F. App'x 164

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 8, 2012·No. No. 11-7230·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Marvin Harold Witherspoon, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Witherspoon v. Stansberry, No. 3:10-cv-00323-REP, 2011 WL 3269645 (E.D.Va. July 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[165]*165tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Marvin Harold Witherspoon, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Witherspoon v. Stansberry, No. 3:10-cv-00323-REP, 2011 WL 3269645 (E.D.Va. July 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[165]*165tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Witherspoon v. Stansberry, 464 F. App'x 164 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

464 F. App'x 164 (Witherspoon v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related