Witherspoon v. Owen
This text of 110 S.E.2d 830 (Witherspoon v. Owen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Conceding defendant’s duty to protect his patrons against foreseeable assaults by 'others, the patron also had a duty not to needlessly expose himself to danger. Here plaintiff and defendant had equial knowledge. Apparently nothing had transpired which would indicate plaintiff could not descend in safety. So far as appears, the others ahead of him had done eo. But if the conditions were such as to warn defendant that plaintiff might be .assaulted if he attempted to descend, these conditions gave equal warning to plaintiff. He could no more ignore the dangerous condition, if it existed, than could defendant.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 S.E.2d 830, 251 N.C. 169, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witherspoon-v-owen-nc-1959.