Witherspoon v. Jeffords Agency, Inc.

120 F. App'x 999
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 18, 2005
Docket03-1467
StatusUnpublished

This text of 120 F. App'x 999 (Witherspoon v. Jeffords Agency, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Witherspoon v. Jeffords Agency, Inc., 120 F. App'x 999 (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joe L. Witherspoon, as personal representative of the Estate of Marie B. Robinson, appeals the district court’s order dismissing Witherspoon’s civil action without prejudice for failure to comply with the magistrate judge’s order to retain counsel. We have reviewed the record as supplemented and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Witherspoon v. Jeffords Agency, Inc., No. CA-02-1831-412BH (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2003); see also Shepherd v. Wellman, 313 F.3d 963, 970-71 (6th Cir.2002); Pridgen v. Andresen, 113 F.3d 391, 393 (2d Cir.1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ryan v. Argent Marine Management, Inc.
Superior Court of Delaware, 2026

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 F. App'x 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witherspoon-v-jeffords-agency-inc-ca4-2005.