Witherspoon v. Jeffords Agency, Inc.

120 F. App'x 999
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Witherspoon v. Jeffords Agency, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 F. App'x 659
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 18, 2005·No. 03-1467·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joe L. Witherspoon, as personal representative of the Estate of Marie B. Robinson, appeals the district court’s order dismissing Witherspoon’s civil action without prejudice for failure to comply with the magistrate judge’s order to retain counsel. We have reviewed the record as supplemented and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Witherspoon v. Jeffords Agency, Inc., No. CA-02-1831-412BH (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2003); see also Shepherd v. Wellman, 313 F.3d 963, 970-71 (6th Cir.2002); Pridgen v. Andresen, 113 F.3d 391, 393 (2d Cir.1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Witherspoon v. Jeffords Agency, Inc., 120 F. App'x 999 (4th Cir. 2005).

120 F. App'x 999 (Witherspoon v. Jeffords Agency, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ryan v. Argent Marine Management, Inc.
Superior Court of Delaware, 2026