Witherspoon v. Booth

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6703

WINFRED WITHERSPOON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

BOOTH, individually and in his or her official capacity, Psych. Assoc., Mrs.; JEREMY SOWERS, individually and in his or her official capacity; SHERRY HAFERKAMP, individually and in his or her official capacity; STATE OF MARYLAND, individually and in his or her own capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01593-JFM)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 5, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Winfred Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholé Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Winfred Witherspoon appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Witherspoon v. Booth, No. 1:09-cv-01593-JFM (D. Md.

May 6, 2010). We also grant Appellees’ motion to waive personal

service and dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED