Witherspoon v. Blanks

1 N.C. 110
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided March 15, 1799·Published

Opinion

By

the Court.

The line in controversy, when run to the end of the distance called for, will not reach Cypress-Creek ; where, by the pa[111]*111tent it is said to terminate ; but, to reach that place, it must run three times the distance called for. In all such cases, the invariable rule is to disregard the distance ; and to proceed with the line in the direction called for until it shall intersect the creek, or other natural boundary.

Badger for the Plaintiff. Graham for the Defendant.

Verdict for the Plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Witherspoon v. Blanks, 1 N.C. 110 (N.C. Ct. App. 1799).

1 N.C. 110 (Witherspoon v. Blanks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.