Withers v. Haines
2 Pa. 435, 1846 Pa. LEXIS 31
Opinion
— We are of opinion the judgment should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the President of the Court of Common Pleas. We refer to the 2d, 3d, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th errors assigned. We give no opinion on the 1st and 2d errors, as we do not deem them the subjects of a writ of error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Withers v. Haines, 2 Pa. 435, 1846 Pa. LEXIS 31 (Pa. 1846).
2 Pa. 435 (Withers v. Haines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gainey v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks
34 F.R.D. 8 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1963)
Smith v. Smith
15 Pa. Super. 366 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)