Withers v. Haines
2 Pa. 435, 1846 Pa. LEXIS 31
This text of 2 Pa. 435 (Withers v. Haines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Withers v. Haines, 2 Pa. 435, 1846 Pa. LEXIS 31 (Pa. 1846).
Opinion
— We are of opinion the judgment should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the President of the Court of Common Pleas. We refer to the 2d, 3d, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th errors assigned. We give no opinion on the 1st and 2d errors, as we do not deem them the subjects of a writ of error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gainey v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks
34 F.R.D. 8 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1963)
Smith v. Smith
15 Pa. Super. 366 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Pa. 435, 1846 Pa. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/withers-v-haines-pa-1846.