Witherow v. Briggs

67 Ill. 96
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1873
StatusPublished

This text of 67 Ill. 96 (Witherow v. Briggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Witherow v. Briggs, 67 Ill. 96 (Ill. 1873).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Sheldon

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action upon a sealed promissory note made by appellants, which was as follows:

$420.00. Bloomington, III., March 1, 1871.

Six months after 'date, for value received, we jointly and severally promise to pay to F. J. Briggs, or order, at the Phoenix Savings, Loan and Trust Co. Bank, four hundred and twenty dollars, payable with the current rate of exchange on New York added. If not paid at maturity, to forfeit and pay 20 per cent interest per annum till paid, as liquidated, agreed and assessed damages thereon for said detention and non-payment.

The court below gave judgment for the principal of the note, with 20 per cent per annum interest from the maturity of the note; the giving of judgment for which interest is the error assigned.

The note itself was all the evidence in the case.

Under repeated decisions of this court, the interest here was in the nature of a penalty to secure the punctual payment of the debt, and recoverable. Lawrence v. Cowles, 13 Ill. 577; Gould v. The Bishop Hill Colony, 35 ib. 324; Davis v. Rider et al. 53 ib. 416.

The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawrence v. Cowles
13 Ill. 577 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1852)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Ill. 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witherow-v-briggs-ill-1873.