Witherell v. Ela
42 N.H. 295
Opinion
The indorser of a note, when it is returned to bim, after protest, may strike out bis own indorsement, although .it is in full, and maintain an action on it in bis own name. Dugan v. U. S., 3 Wheat. 183; Piquet v. Curtis, 1 Sum. 480; Thompson v. Robinson, 4 Johns. 21; Emerson v. Cutts, 12 Mass. 78; Nevins v. De Grand, 15 Mass. 438; Bank of Utica v. Smith, 18 Johns. 230; Norris v. Badger, 6 Cow. 455; Chat. Co. Bank v. Davis, 21 Wend. 584; Chit, on Bills, 230, n. a; Edw. on Bills, 271.
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Witherell v. Ela, 42 N.H. 295 (N.H. 1861).
42 N.H. 295 (Witherell v. Ela) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Olivera v. The Union Insurance Company
16 U.S. 183 (Supreme Court, 1818)
Norris v. Badger
6 Cow. 449 (New York Supreme Court, 1826)
Pitcher v. Livingston
4 Johns. 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1809)
Bank of Utica v. Smith
18 Johns. 230 (New York Supreme Court, 1820)
Chautauque County Bank v. Davis
21 Wend. 584 (New York Supreme Court, 1839)