Witham v. New York State

Fourth Circuit

Witham v. New York State

568 F. App'x 241

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2014·No. No. 13-2482·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Judson Witham appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Witham v. New York State, No. 5:13-cv-00611-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 24, [242]*2422013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Judson Witham appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Witham v. New York State, No. 5:13-cv-00611-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 24, [242]*2422013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Witham v. New York State, 568 F. App'x 241 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

568 F. App'x 241 (Witham v. New York State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related