Witham v. DEC New York

699 F. App'x 233
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 23, 2017·No. No. 17-1791·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Judson Witham appeals the district court’s order dismissing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), his civil complaint in which he asserted claims against various New York individuals and entities arising out of their construction, operation, and maintenance of dams, resulting in the destruction of lakes and land, including Witham’s family’s property and marina. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Witham v. DEC New York State, No. 5:17-cv-00171-BO (E.D.N.C. May 31, 2017). We deny Witham’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Witham v. DEC New York, 699 F. App'x 233 (4th Cir. 2017).

699 F. App'x 233 (Witham v. DEC New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)