Witham v. DEC New York

699 F. App'x 233
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 23, 2017
DocketNo. 17-1791
StatusPublished

This text of 699 F. App'x 233 (Witham v. DEC New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Witham v. DEC New York, 699 F. App'x 233 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Judson Witham appeals the district court’s order dismissing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), his civil complaint in which he asserted claims against various New York individuals and entities arising out of their construction, operation, and maintenance of dams, resulting in the destruction of lakes and land, including Witham’s family’s property and marina. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Witham v. DEC New York State, No. 5:17-cv-00171-BO (E.D.N.C. May 31, 2017). We deny Witham’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
699 F. App'x 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witham-v-dec-new-york-ca4-2017.