Witcher v. Westphal

Fourth Circuit

Witcher v. Westphal

112 F. App'x 924

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 15, 2004

DocketNo. 04-1518

StatusPublished

This text of 112 F. App'x 924 (Witcher v. Westphal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Witcher v. Westphal, 112 F. App'x 924 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Murray Witcher appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in his employer’s favor in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Witcher v. Westphal, No. CA-00-2676-RDB (D.Md. filed Mar. 22, 2004 & entered Mar. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Murray Witcher appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in his employer’s favor in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Witcher v. Westphal, No. CA-00-2676-RDB (D.Md. filed Mar. 22, 2004 & entered Mar. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 F. App'x 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witcher-v-westphal-ca4-2004.