Witcher v. Fairlawn
673 N.E.2d 1383, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1511, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 296
This text of 673 N.E.2d 1383 (Witcher v. Fairlawn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Witcher v. Fairlawn, 673 N.E.2d 1383, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1511, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 296 (Ohio 1997).
Opinion
Summit App. No. 17745. On December 81,1996, appellant filed a document titled “Motion for leave to file delayed motion for reconsideration.” Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XTV(1)(C) prohibits motions to waive the prohibition against untimely filings,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant’s motion be, and hereby is, stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
673 N.E.2d 1383, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1511, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witcher-v-fairlawn-ohio-1997.