Witcher v. Bayer CropScience USA LP

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 12, 2009
Docket08-1614
StatusUnpublished

This text of Witcher v. Bayer CropScience USA LP (Witcher v. Bayer CropScience USA LP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Witcher v. Bayer CropScience USA LP, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1614

KEVIN E. WITCHER; BOBBY BURNS,

Plaintiffs – Appellants,

v.

BAYER CROPSCIENCE USA LP, Its agents, employees and those in concert with,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:06-cv-00947)

Submitted: February 18, 2009 Decided: March 12, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eunice L. Green, GREEN LAW FIRM, Dunbar, West Virginia, for Appellants. Joseph M. Price, Mark H. Hayes, ROBINSON & MCELWEE, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kevin E. Witcher and Bobby Burns appeal the district

court’s order granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on

their retaliation, racial discrimination and hostile work

environment claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17

(2000) (“Title VII”), and West Virginia law. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

the district court’s order. See Witcher v. Bayer CropScience

USA LP, No. 2:06-cv-00947 (S.D. W. Va. Apr. 14, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Witcher v. Bayer CropScience USA LP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witcher-v-bayer-cropscience-usa-lp-ca4-2009.