Witcher v. Bayer Cropscience USA LP

316 F. App'x 263
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 12, 2009·No. No. 08-1614·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin E. Witcher and Bobby Burns appeal the district court’s order granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on their retaliation, racial discrimination and hostile work environment claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000) (“Title VII”), and West Virginia law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Witcher v. Bayer CropScience USA LP, No. 2:06-cv-00947 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Witcher v. Bayer Cropscience USA LP, 316 F. App'x 263 (4th Cir. 2009).

316 F. App'x 263 (Witcher v. Bayer Cropscience USA LP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e