Witbeck v. Waine

8 How. Pr. 433
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1853
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 8 How. Pr. 433 (Witbeck v. Waine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Witbeck v. Waine, 8 How. Pr. 433 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1853).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Supreme Court had full power to order a re-settlement, and it was not necessary to first apply to the Court of Appeals to remit the record to the Supreme Court. Ren agt. Barber, (2 Cowen, 408;) Lyslie agt. Sniffin, (3 How. Pr. R., 250.)

Order at special term affirmed, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pratt v. Baker
34 N.Y.S. 766 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Clendenning v. Lindner
64 N.Y. St. Rep. 623 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1895)
Clendenning v. Lindner
31 N.Y.S. 844 (Superior Court of New York, 1895)
O'Gorman v. Kamak
5 Daly 517 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1875)
People v. Albany & Susquehanna Railroad Co.
57 Barb. 204 (New York Supreme Court, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 How. Pr. 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witbeck-v-waine-nysupct-1853.