WIT Associates, Inc.

CourtArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals
DecidedDecember 19, 2018
DocketASBCA No. 61547
StatusPublished

This text of WIT Associates, Inc. (WIT Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
WIT Associates, Inc., (asbca 2018).

Opinion

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of -- ) ) WIT Associates, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 6154 7 ) Under Contract No. N68836-10-D-0002 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Steven P. O'Carroll CFO I APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Ronald J. Borro, Esq. Navy Chief Trial Attorney Robert R. Kiepura, Esq. Trial Attorney

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MCILMAIL ON THE GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

The government moves to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, arguing that the claim is not properly certified.

STA TEMENT OF FACTS (SOF) FOR PURPOSES OF THE MOTION

In 2009, the government awarded a transportation services contract to WIT Associates, Inc. (R4, tab 1). In 2016, WIT's president, Eugenio Smoot, presented to the contracting officer a certified claim for $866,051.79 (R4, tab 2 at 306). The certification, which Mr. Smoot signed, reads:

In accordance with [Federal Acquisition Regulation] 52.233-1, I certify that this claim is made in good faith; that the supporting data are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; that the amount requested accurately reflects the contract adjustment for which Guardian believes the Government is liable; and that I am authorized to certify the claim on behalf of Guardian. f (R4, tab 2 at 314 (emphasis added)) WIT says that:

I Guardian is the parent company of WIT. The ownership and management is one and the same.

(App. resp. at 1)

DECISION

For claims of more than $100,000 made by a contractor, the contractor shall certify that (A) the claim is made in good faith; (8) the supporting data are accurate and complete to the best of the contractor's knowledge and belief: (C) the amount requested accurately reflects the contract adjustment for which the contractor believes the Federal Government is liable; and (D) the certifier is authorized to certify the claim on behalf of the contractor. 41 U.S.C. § 7103(b)(l). Although that certification is a precondition to the Board's jurisdiction, a defective certification does not deprive the Board of jurisdiction, but must be corrected prior to a final judgment. Air Services, Inc., ASBCA No. 59843, 15-1BCA136,146 at 176,426 (citing 41 U.S.C. § 7I03(b)(3)). Here the certification is defective but correctable: it fails to meet at least the third and fourth attestations of a proper certification (by attempting to certify the claim in the name of, and on behalf of, an entity (Guardian) other than WIT). but meets at least the first attestation because it certifies that the claim is made in good faith.* Cf id. at 176,424, 176,427 (defective certification meeting only two of the required attestations was correctable); Western Plains Disposal. ASBCA No. 56986. 11-1 BCA 134,617 at 170,612-13 (defective certification \Vas correctable where it certified that "cost or pricing data ... submitted .. .in support of [REA J are accurate. complete, and current"); Northwest Marine, Inc .• ASBCA No. 41702, 91-2 BCA 124,020 at 120,272-73 (claim certifier's position within contractor's parent company irrelevant to determination of adequacy of certification), recon. denied, 91-3 BCA 124,079 at 120,527. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is denied. and an order requiring correction of the certification will follow.

* The government does not specifically address, and, for the moment, we do not consider, whether the challenged certification meets the second attestation. 2 I I f CONCLUSION

The motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is denied.

Dated: December 19, 2018

~7 T~CI Administrative Judge Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

I concur I concur

~EFORD OWEN C. WILSON Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Vice Chairman Armed Services Board Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61547, Appeal of WIT Associates, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Decision by contracting officer
41 U.S.C. § 7103(b)(l)
§ 7I03
41 U.S.C. § 7I03(b)(3)
§ 7I
41 U.S.C. § 7I

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
WIT Associates, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wit-associates-inc-asbca-2018.