Wiswell v. Baxter

20 Wis. 680
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1866
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 20 Wis. 680 (Wiswell v. Baxter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wiswell v. Baxter, 20 Wis. 680 (Wis. 1866).

Opinion

Cole, J.

It seems to be well established by tbe authorities that tbe six years statute of limitation constitutes no bar to a suit to foreclose tbe mortgage, although it might have been [682]*682pleaded to a suit upon tbe notes. These mortgages are under seal, and recognize distinctly tbe debt to secure tbe payment of wbicb they are given. There is no question as to whether or not the personal liability of the mortgagor continues, since no judgment for a deficiency is ashed against him. And in fact, judgment was only taken for the foreclosure and sale of the mortgaged premises to satisfy the amount found due upon the mortgages. That this judgment was correct is clear from the adjudicated cases cited by the counsel for the respondent.

A question is made as to whether the interest was rightly computed upon the seventy-five dollar mortgage. That mortgage was given to secure the payment of “ the sum of seventy-five dollars, with interest thereon according to the condition of one certain promissory note,” accompanying the same; and by the note the mortgagor promised to pay interest on the note at the rate therein specified “ until paid.'" In view of this language there would not seem to be room for doubt as to what rate of interest the mortgage debt bears.

We can see no error in the judgment, and think it must be affirmed.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Hecker
2019 WI App 26 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2019)
Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Klomsten
2018 WI App 25 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2018)
Bank of Wildwood v. Kerl
189 So. 866 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Ogden v. Bradshaw
150 N.W. 399 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1915)
Bur v. Bong
150 N.W. 431 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1915)
Colonial & United States Mortgage Co. v. Northwest Thresher Co.
70 L.R.A. 814 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1905)
Wells v. Scanlan
102 N.W. 571 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1905)
Satterlund v. Beal
95 N.W. 518 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1903)
Spencer v. Holman
89 N.W. 132 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1902)
Duecker v. Goeres
80 N.W. 91 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1899)
Phelan v. Fitzpatrick
54 N.W. 614 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1893)
Delaney v. Brunette
23 N.W. 22 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1885)
Hayes v. Frey
11 N.W. 695 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1882)
State v. Watts
44 N.J.L. 126 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1882)
Browne v. Browne
17 Fla. 607 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1880)
Potter v. Stransky
4 N.W. 95 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1880)
Hubbard v. Callahan
42 Conn. 524 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1875)
Cape Girardeau County ex rel. Road & Canal Fund v. Harbison
58 Mo. 90 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1874)
Edgerton v. Schneider
26 Wis. 385 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Wis. 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiswell-v-baxter-wis-1866.