Wistar v. Gillilan
This text of 4 A. 815 (Wistar v. Gillilan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The precise question now presented was before us and decided in Wistar v. Scott, 105 Pa. 200, 51 Am. Rep. 197. It then received a careful consideration. The same reasons substantially were urged then, which are urged now, to induce us to give a different construction to the will of Richard Wistar the elder. We have given due consideration to the able argument of the counsel for the plaintiffs in error, and have re-examined the case. We discover no just reason for changing the views then expressed. We therefore adhere to the construction then put upon the devise in question.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 A. 815, 1 Sadler 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wistar-v-gillilan-pa-1886.