WISONG v. State
344 S.W.3d 782, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 615, 2011 WL 1639254
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Peter Wisong appeals the denial of a Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. He claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to certain testimony and a portion of the State’s closing argument.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
WISONG v. State, 344 S.W.3d 782, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 615, 2011 WL 1639254 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
344 S.W.3d 782 (WISONG v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cobb v. State
344 S.W.3d 782 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)