Wisniski v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Wisniski v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA

887 A.2d 1238, 585 Pa. 44, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2927

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 21, 2005

DocketAppeal 30 MAP 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 887 A.2d 1238 (Wisniski v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wisniski v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA, 887 A.2d 1238, 585 Pa. 44, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2927 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Superior Court is hereby VACATED. The matter is remanded to the Superior Court for reconsideration of whether a duty exists by applying the five-prong test as set forth in Althaus v. Cohen, 562 Pa. 547, 756 A.2d 1166 (2000), and for an opinion in support thereof.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

Justice NIGRO did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI