Wisniski v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA
887 A.2d 1238, 585 Pa. 44, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2927
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 21, 2005·No. Appeal 30 MAP 2005·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
ORDER
The decision of the Superior Court is hereby VACATED. The matter is remanded to the Superior Court for reconsideration of whether a duty exists by applying the five-prong test as set forth in Althaus v. Cohen, 562 Pa. 547, 756 A.2d 1166 (2000), and for an opinion in support thereof.
Jurisdiction relinquished.
Justice NIGRO did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wisniski v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA, 887 A.2d 1238, 585 Pa. 44, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2927 (Pa. 2005).
887 A.2d 1238 (Wisniski v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
East Liberty Development, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2024
Sawyers v. v. Davis, N.
2019 Pa. Super. 319 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2019)
Wisniski v. Brown & Brown Ins. Co. of PA
906 A.2d 571 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)