Wisniewski v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wisniewski v. State

779 So. 2d 306, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9695, 1999 WL 510640

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wisniewski v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 805 So. 2d 901 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 21, 1999·No. No. 97-05230·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s October 1997 order extending Mr. Wisniewski’s commitment due to continuing insanity. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.218. Mr. Wisniewski has been so detained since November 1994. We are aware that he has had another hearing in late 1998 and presumably will have another hearing at the end of this year. In light of the disputed testimony in this record, we would suggest that the appointment of two or three experts pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.218(c) would be appropriate for the next hearing if that did not occur at the 1998 hearing.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s October 1997 order extending Mr. Wisniewski’s commitment due to continuing insanity. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.218. Mr. Wisniewski has been so detained since November 1994. We are aware that he has had another hearing in late 1998 and presumably will have another hearing at the end of this year. In light of the disputed testimony in this record, we would suggest that the appointment of two or three experts pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.218(c) would be appropriate for the next hearing if that did not occur at the 1998 hearing.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.

Wisniewski v. State, 779 So. 2d 306, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9695, 1999 WL 510640 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

779 So. 2d 306 (Wisniewski v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.